Neurons Lab vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Neurons Lab (4.5/5) edges ahead of Addepto (4.3/5) overall. Neurons Lab is the better choice for banks and insurers piloting agentic AI under regulation. Addepto is the stronger option for data teams needing warehouse work before an LLM project. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Neurons Lab vs Addepto: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| HQ | London, UK | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 51–200 | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Financial-services agent work delivered by an AWS Advanced Tier partner that also holds a public-sector designation | Data engineering and MLOps come first, so AI features sit on warehouses that are already clean and monitored |
| Pricing model | Fixed-price discovery and proof of concept, then T&M; rates on request | $50–$99/hr (Clutch band); discovery workshops, then T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Primary tech stack | AWS Bedrock, Amazon SageMaker, LangChain | Databricks, Snowflake, Azure OpenAI |
| Industries served | Financial services, Insurance, Healthcare, Public sector | Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce, Aviation, Financial services |
Neurons Lab vs Addepto: overview
Neurons Lab
Neurons Lab is an AI-first consultancy incorporated in London in October 2019, with a second office in Singapore and a distributed engineering team. It is an AWS Advanced Tier Services Partner with the Generative AI competency and joined the AWS Public Sector Partner programme in September 2024. Recent published work leans toward financial services, including an AI-driven investment product built with a global asset manager. Third-party estimates put direct headcount at roughly 50–200, supplemented by a contractor network.
Addepto
Addepto is a Warsaw-based AI and data consultancy that started trading in April 2018 (some directories list 2017). Clutch shows 50–249 employees, a $50–$99 hourly band and a $10,000 minimum project. CB Insights reports that KMS Technology acquired the company in December 2025, after an earlier tie-up with Grape Up. Its work typically begins with data engineering and moves on to generative AI, MLOps and AI discovery workshops.
Services and capabilities: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Capability | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| CRM / ERP integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM API gateway & cost control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document processing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Agentic workflows | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price pilot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Managed services after launch | ✗ | ✗ |
| PII masking & access control | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Framework / platform | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | N/A | N/A |
| HubSpot | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | N/A | ✓ |
| Databricks | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure OpenAI | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS Bedrock | ✓ | N/A |
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| ServiceNow | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Criterion | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope audit or pilot, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Dimension | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Insurance, Healthcare | Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce, Aviation |
| Best use cases | Research or advisory agents for an asset manager that pull from internal and market data., Customer-service agents for an insurer with audit logging on every action. | Building a Databricks lakehouse that later feeds demand forecasts and an internal assistant., Productionizing ML models with MLflow and monitoring. |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope audit or pilot | Fixed project |
Neurons Lab vs Addepto: pros and cons
| Neurons Lab | |
|---|---|
| + | Regulated-finance experience shows up in how it scopes data access and model risk |
| + | Fixed-price discovery and proof-of-concept stages limit early spend |
| + | AWS Advanced Tier and GenAI competency are confirmed through AWS programmes |
| + | Small senior teams with direct access to founders |
| - | Not yet AWS Premier Tier, and its own job ads have described that as a future goal |
| - | Weaker fit for Azure- or SAP-heavy estates |
| - | A small core team relies on a contractor network for larger programmes |
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed Clutch rate band and $10,000 minimum make budgeting straightforward |
| + | Databricks and Spark experience helps when the data estate is the real blocker |
| + | Discovery workshops scope use cases before larger spend |
| + | Predictive analytics and LLM work available from the same team |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025 (per CB Insights), so ownership and leadership may change |
| - | Corporate history includes several restructurings, which complicates long-term vendor planning |
| - | Limited published work inside CRM platforms |
Who should choose Neurons Lab?
A typical fit: research or advisory agents for an asset manager that pull from internal and market data.
Financial-services agent work delivered by an AWS Advanced Tier partner that also holds a public-sector designation. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Insurance, Healthcare, Public sector.
Who should choose Addepto?
A typical fit: building a Databricks lakehouse that later feeds demand forecasts and an internal assistant.
Data engineering and MLOps come first, so AI features sit on warehouses that are already clean and monitored. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce, Aviation, Financial services.
Decision matrix: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want a fixed-price audit or pilot before committing | Neurons Lab |
| AI has to work inside your existing CRM or ERP | Neither lists CRM/ERP integration work |
| Personal data must be masked and answers limited by user permissions | Neurons Lab |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Neurons Lab (Not disclosed) vs Addepto ($10,000+ (Clutch)) |
| You want the vendor to run the AI service after launch | Neither offers managed services; plan in-house operations |
| You are building multi-step agents across systems | Neurons Lab |
Use case fit: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Use case | Neurons Lab fit | Addepto fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research or advisory agents for an asset manager that pull from internal and market data. | Strong | Limited | Neurons Lab |
| Customer-service agents for an insurer with audit logging on every action. | Strong | Limited | Neurons Lab |
| Building a Databricks lakehouse that later feeds demand forecasts and an internal assistant. | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Productionizing ML models with MLflow and monitoring. | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
Verdict: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
Neurons Lab (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Integration projects. Financial-services agent work delivered by an AWS Advanced Tier partner that also holds a public-sector designation.
Addepto (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need productionizing ML models with MLflow and monitoring. If your situation matches that, Addepto is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Neurons Lab vs Addepto FAQ
Is Neurons Lab better than Addepto?
Neurons Lab (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Neurons Lab's strongest advantage: regulated-finance experience shows up in how it scopes data access and model risk. Addepto's strongest advantage: publicly listed Clutch rate band and $10,000 minimum make budgeting straightforward.
How do Neurons Lab and Addepto differ in pricing?
Neurons Lab pricing: Fixed-price discovery and proof of concept, then T&M; rates on request. Addepto pricing: $50–$99/hr (Clutch band); discovery workshops, then T&M. Minimum engagement: $10,000+ (Clutch). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Neurons Lab or Addepto?
Neurons Lab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Neurons Lab and Addepto?
Neurons Lab's primary differentiator is: financial-services agent work delivered by an AWS Advanced Tier partner that also holds a public-sector designation. Addepto's primary differentiator is: data engineering and MLOps come first, so AI features sit on warehouses that are already clean and monitored. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 50–249), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs $10,000+ (Clutch)), and primary industries served (Financial services, Insurance vs Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.