EPAM Systems vs Globant: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.3/5) edges ahead of Globant (4.0/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for large enterprises with Salesforce and SAP estates. Globant is the stronger option for firms wanting subscription-priced AI capacity. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Globant: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2003 |
| HQ | Newtown, PA, USA | Luxembourg (operations: Buenos Aires) |
| Team size | 60,000+ | 28,500+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Engineering depth across Salesforce, SAP and major model providers, including a formal partnership with Anthropic | Subscription AI Pods supervised by human experts, sold as a product instead of billed by the hour |
| Pricing model | T&M, dedicated teams and fixed-scope programmes; rates on request | AI Pod subscriptions plus traditional T&M; rates on request |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Salesforce, SAP, Azure OpenAI | Globant Enterprise AI, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare & life sciences, Retail, Travel, Manufacturing | Media, Financial services, Retail, Travel |
EPAM Systems vs Globant: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems is a NYSE-listed software engineering services company founded in 1993 in Princeton, New Jersey, and now headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with roughly 62,000 employees in more than 55 countries. It runs large Salesforce and SAP Commerce practices and bought Netherlands-based Just-BI to deepen its SAP consulting. In May 2026 it announced a multi-year partnership with Anthropic and a plan to certify more than 10,000 architects on Claude. Its AI/RUN platform is used to package enterprise deployments.
Globant
Globant is a NYSE-listed digital engineering company founded in 2003 in Buenos Aires and legally domiciled in Luxembourg, with more than 28,500 employees in over 30 countries. Its AI Pods are subscription units run by AI agents and supervised by human experts, and their annual recurring revenue reached $52.8 million in the second quarter of 2026. Glob.AI, launched in August 2026, sells these pods online and cites partnerships with OpenAI and Anthropic. Globant lowered its 2026 revenue guidance after slower North American decision cycles.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| CRM / ERP integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| LLM API gateway & cost control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document processing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Agentic workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price pilot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Managed services after launch | ✗ | ✗ |
| PII masking & access control | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | ✓ | ✓ |
| SAP | ✓ | N/A |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | N/A | N/A |
| HubSpot | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | N/A | N/A |
| Databricks | N/A | N/A |
| Azure OpenAI | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS Bedrock | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| ServiceNow | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time & materials, Dedicated team | Subscription, Time & materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare & life sciences, Retail | Media, Financial services, Retail |
| Best use cases | Agentforce and service-agent features across a large Salesforce estate., AI features in SAP Commerce storefronts and order flows. | Buying AI-agent capacity for content or testing tasks on subscription., Large-scale digital product work with AI features. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
EPAM Systems vs Globant: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Thousands of certified Salesforce staff and a dedicated SAP Commerce bench |
| + | Formal model-provider partnership gives early access and support for Claude-based builds |
| + | Engineering rigor suited to complex, multi-system integrations |
| + | Large nearshore delivery in Central Europe and Latin America |
| - | Scale and account structure favour large, multi-year engagements |
| - | Delivery staff numbers for specific platforms come partly from older announcements |
| - | Advice tends to lead toward EPAM-delivered builds |
| Globant | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing makes AI capacity easier to budget |
| + | Large Latin American delivery base with U.S. time-zone overlap |
| + | Formal partnerships with major model providers |
| - | The AI Pods model is new and has a short track record |
| - | Guidance cut in 2026 signals financial pressure |
| - | Less evidence of deep CRM or ERP integration work |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: agentforce and service-agent features across a large Salesforce estate.
Engineering depth across Salesforce, SAP and major model providers, including a formal partnership with Anthropic. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare & life sciences, Retail, Travel, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Globant?
A typical fit: buying AI-agent capacity for content or testing tasks on subscription.
Subscription AI Pods supervised by human experts, sold as a product instead of billed by the hour. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Media, Financial services, Retail, Travel.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want a fixed-price audit or pilot before committing | Neither advertises one; ask for a scoped pilot |
| AI has to work inside your existing CRM or ERP | EPAM Systems |
| Personal data must be masked and answers limited by user permissions | Ask both for their PII and access-control design |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not disclosed) vs Globant (Not disclosed) |
| You want the vendor to run the AI service after launch | Neither offers managed services; plan in-house operations |
| You are building multi-step agents across systems | Both |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Globant fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentforce and service-agent features across a large Salesforce estate. | Strong | Limited | EPAM Systems |
| AI features in SAP Commerce storefronts and order flows. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Buying AI-agent capacity for content or testing tasks on subscription. | Limited | Strong | Globant |
| Large-scale digital product work with AI features. | Limited | Strong | Globant |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Globant
EPAM Systems (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Integration projects. Engineering depth across Salesforce, SAP and major model providers, including a formal partnership with Anthropic.
Globant (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale digital product work with AI features. If your situation matches that, Globant is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Globant FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Globant?
EPAM Systems (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: thousands of certified Salesforce staff and a dedicated SAP Commerce bench. Globant's strongest advantage: subscription pricing makes AI capacity easier to budget.
How do EPAM Systems and Globant differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems pricing: T&M, dedicated teams and fixed-scope programmes; rates on request. Globant pricing: AI Pod subscriptions plus traditional T&M; rates on request. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Globant?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Globant?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: engineering depth across Salesforce, SAP and major model providers, including a formal partnership with Anthropic. Globant's primary differentiator is: subscription AI Pods supervised by human experts, sold as a product instead of billed by the hour. They also differ in team size (60,000+ vs 28,500+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare & life sciences vs Media, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.